Skip to Content

Welcome!

Share and discuss the best content and new marketing ideas, build your professional profile and become a better marketer together.

Sign up

You need to be registered to interact with the community.
This question has been flagged
0 Views

Looking at the pace of development in the 60s compared to now, many argue that regional autonomy was more effective. The 1963 constitution gave regions control over their resources and development. What do you think? - Would regional government solve our current problems? - What about the risk of secession? - How would resource control work? Let's have a constructive debate. (Masquerade Mode available for anonymous posting)

Avatar
Discard